[Noisebridge-discuss] (no subject)

johny radio johnyradio at gmail.com
Thu May 30 19:35:41 UTC 2013


(continued from previous email)
If NB is a hackerspace, which encourages hacking and improving
circuits, software, and society, is it a contradiction to say that the
one thing that CANNOT be hacked is NB processes and structure?

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:34 PM, johny radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jake at spaz.org wrote:
> "The complaint I have is with people who are in a position to improve
> noisebridge, for example by embracing a new era of access control, but
> are not willing to do it because they don't see a problem."
>
> Jake,
>
> I quite agree. I would add that some members feels that lack of any
> sort of structure, rules, or access-control is fundamental to anarchy,
> and must be maintained at NB.
>
> Also, if NB is a hackerspace, which encourages hacking and improving
> circuits, software, and society, is it a contradiction to say that the
> one thing that CANNOT



More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list