[Noisebridge-discuss] on consensus

Ronald Cotoni setient at gmail.com
Sat Mar 15 01:54:32 UTC 2014


On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:33 PM, rachel lyra hospodar
<rachelyra at gmail.com>wrote:

> In a recent email,
> On 3/14/2014 2:17 PM, Al Sweigart wrote:
>> No one owes anyone compromise or explanation when they block an item.
> which is actually patently untrue and kind of an integral part of any
> consensus process - people willing to work with each other.  I don't have a
> horse in the tom-jake argument, have seen them both be reasonable and
> not-reasonable at different times, and consider them both to be friends.
> I have been meaning to write some ranty polemics to the list about how
> consensus works, since many of us seem to be missing some key things.
> I just went off hiatus, kids.  look out.
> R.
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

Ronald Cotoni
Systems Engineer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140314/565775a2/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list