[Noisebridge-discuss] New furniture
Casey Callendrello
c1 at caseyc.net
Fri Dec 7 20:58:12 UTC 2012
For quicker trips, ZipVans can't be beat. They have those white panel
vans (you know, the ones that scream "child molester") available by the
hour.
--Casey
On 12/7/12 11:30 AM, Andrew Byrne wrote:
> Wow, thanks! I'm new here, so I'm not too familiar with the salvage
> depots; back in Baltimore, they knew me by name. I don't have a truck
> yet, so maybe I'll look on craigslist and ask around my social
> circles. If someone has a lead on ways to transport large heavy
> objects across the bay, I'm all ears.
> best
> -AnB
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:05 AM, rachel lyra hospodar
> <rachelyra at gmail.com <mailto:rachelyra at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Building resources in sf and urban ore in east bay sell big hunks
> of wood, if you wanted to go that route. The Reuse People in
> Alameda do deconstruction rather than taking donations, so they
> tend to have even larger-scale stuff, as well as lots more unused
> construction overages.
>
> R.
>
> On Dec 6, 2012 12:39 PM, "Andrew Byrne" <andrew at pachakutech.com
> <mailto:andrew at pachakutech.com>> wrote:
>
> Sometimes it's fun to be a bitch, but amyl nitrate is hard to
> come by.
>
> Still looking for those big pieces of wood; will be up in the
> Presidio today, so maybe I'll get lucky.
> =]
> -AnB
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Tony Longshanks LeTigre
> <anthonyletigre at gmail.com <mailto:anthonyletigre at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> I had one more thing to add, after reading more of this
> thread:
>
> *Are you kidding? I /love/ bitches!* One of my
> personalities is a total Joan Crawford, ice-cold bitch on
> rollerblades. My other personalities hate her.
>
> It's a good thing I'll never have children.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Tony Longshanks LeTigre
> <anthonyletigre at gmail.com
> <mailto:anthonyletigre at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I had not seen or read the apology message before I
> posted my message. I've been too busy to read most of
> the posts lately, but I skim them to keep a handle on
> what's going on at least. I saw something that made me
> react & didn't have or take the time to read
> exhaustively through the thread. I apologize if my
> response seemed "aggro," it was intended as criticism
> but not a full-frontal attack & certainly not a troll
> post; actually I made an effort to end it on a
> positive, forward-moving note. I will try to be more
> exhaustive in reading before responding in future.
>
> +11+
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Brian Cloutier
> <briancloutier2010 at gmail.com
> <mailto:briancloutier2010 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> >I think you owe him (and Josh) an apology for the
> unqualified harshness
>
> >You are overreacting.
>
> You guys do realize she said sorry right?
>
> > Maybe you will all love this, as I will now make
> an example of my own cognitive fallacies, instead
> of someone else's. [...] I just reread my exchange
> with josh and while I called him out for
> challenging my statements rather than querying
> them, [...]. The wording is, in fact, a query.
>
> "After some review, it turns out that I was wrong"
>
> > How much of that set of my assumptions come
> from my knowledge of josh and past interactions
> with him? How much is rooted in other experiences
> I have had? In this case especially I am not
> really sure.
>
> "We've been dicks to each other in the past, so I
> made a rash judgement and assumed that pattern was
> continuing"
>
> > We are a sort of organic computer that
> constructs algorithms based on data of
> interactions. If everyone bases their reactions to
> each other on past experiences then there is some
> necessary noise in the system.
>
> "We are all human, and we all mistakes"
>
> > but what about for all those crazy feminist
> bitches who flip out every time you interrupt them?
>
> "Again my bad, I overreacted."
>
> > How do you deal with the ways that people act
> and react, especially when they are different than
> what you might be wanting? I deal with it by
> trying to imagine what their motivations are, [...]
>
> "Usually I do try to be empathetic."
>
> > Sometimes I make false conclusions based on my
> own preconceptions or situation. [...] One thing
> I like about the
> metacognitive-neurolinguistic-social-interaction
> field of study is that it begins by acknowledging
> this.
>
> "However this time I really messed up, and I
> realize that"
>
>
> This is actually a pretty damn good apology.
> Instead of just saying "I'm sorry" Rachel is
> saying what went wrong, why it happened, and by
> referencing science implicitly stating she'll try
> to do better in the future.
>
> So... can we back off?
>
> - Brian
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:04 PM, John Withers
> <jwithers at reddagger.org
> <mailto:jwithers at reddagger.org>> wrote:
>
> I love how anytime anyone disagrees with you
> going off on people, you
> can never be wrong because anyone pointing out
> that you go over the top
> agro on people who intended no harm, they are
> evil oppressors.
>
> It's win win and possibly one of the most
> brilliant perma-troll tactics
> I have ever seen. Very nice work.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 15:03 -0500, rachel lyra
> hospodar wrote:
> >
> > I found this article by searching "calling
> out oppression" and
> > "over-reacting".
> >
> http://ab-wg.blogspot.com/2009/01/role-of-allies.html?m=1
> > Maybe I should make a chart of boringly
> predictable oblivous
> > responses, or a robot like lmgtfy that
> deflects blacklisted emails
> > using their adjectives as search terms.
> >
> > Because there are just so many goshdarned
> people playing out the same
> > predictable social dynamics that there are
> in fact rote predictable
> > responses to these discussions.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> *You should read my diaries after I die---I talk about
> you a lot in there.*
>
>
>
>
> --
> *You should read my diaries after I die---I talk about you
> a lot in there.*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> -- --
> -- -- -- --
> -- -- -- -- -- --
> @AndruByrne
> CEO, Pachakutech
> www.pachakutech.com/intro.html
> <http://www.pachakutech.com/intro.html>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> -- --
> -- -- -- --
> -- -- -- -- -- --
> @AndruByrne
> CEO, Pachakutech
> www.pachakutech.com/intro.html <http://www.pachakutech.com/intro.html>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20121207/8ebed092/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list