[Noisebridge-discuss] Use of Nitrous Oxide in the space on Sunday night

[Corey McGuire]

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:59 AM, rachel lyra hospodar
<rachelyra at gmail.com>wrote:

> I think the issue is not that we should make a rule about nitrous and you
> can only use it if you are hacking brains. I think the issue is that zach,
> who is a part of our community, had a problem and people didn't respond by
> giving enough of a shit.
>
Was there a critical mass of people giving a shit?  If there is only one
person offended by a groups actions, they should be invited to remove
themselves.

One person's morality should not be applied to the majority.  In my
experience, and I have only used n2o in the company of my dentist (and,
strangely enough, only as a minor *shrug*), people using n2o are unlikely
to cause any fuss.  It seems like judgement of character is being applied
because of the behaviors witnessed and that is unexcellent.

If the offended party feels it is unexcellent that these people did not
respond to his request to stop, need I remind him that he was interrupting
their life experience to begin with.

Yes, "Huff'n" is illegal.  But this logic applies to any other behavior.
If only one person, out of a large group, is offended, it's probably their
problem.

Exceptions, of course.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20121018/0345327d/attachment-0003.html>